“It’s Not Fair…” – The God of the Old Testament Vs. the God of the New Testament December 18, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.15 comments
In my 11th grade English class, I had a teacher named Mr Dasher. He was an educated country boy from Georgia who was very disenchanted with the US Army, and had a killer music collection. Aside from introducing me to Young Goodman Brown, Giles Corey, and the French Lieutenant’s Woman, he also turned me on to Van Morrison, John Lee Hooker, and Freddie King.
We had lots of Bible beaters at the high school I attended, and one day, I overheard Mr Dasher talking to one of them. “Now, do you believe in the God of the Old Testament, or the one in the New Testament?” he asked in his lazy drawl. I don’t at all remember the girl’s response; I think I was too busy pondering his question. Of course, I knew exactly what he meant, but I think that was the first time I had ever really heard it phrased that way.
He (as well as many others) viewed God in the Old Testament as harsh, unbending, veangeful, possibly even cruel. Whereas, God in the New Testament was loving, forgiving, and merciful. I know Mr Dasher didn’t believe these were two separate gods; he was merely mocking this girl’s faith. But this is still an interesting observation, and one that I think bears looking into.
Authority
Any time you study an issue, you’ve got to have a reliable source. You’ve got to be able to go back to something (or several things) upon which you can base observations, compare your findings, gain unbiased information. God has given us such a source in his Bible. I’m not going to spend time giving proofs to the authenticity of God’s word; that would take us so far off topic we’d completely lose sight of our intended goal.
Instead, I’m going to let you know that I believe the Bible to be the inerrant, infallible, and inspired word of God. I believe that the scriptures are “God-breathed” – that “holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit” (1 Pet 1:21). And I further believe that the Bible is “profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Tim 3:16).
That said, we’re going to look at what the Bible says about God’s character. Does he change? Why did he do certain things in the Old Testament that seemed so harsh? And do the different testaments provide two different views of God, or is there a larger picture?
Change
Again, it’s usually in a mocking tone that people refer to the “different” gods of the Old and New Testaments. But behind the jab lies the deeper question of whether or not God acts differently between the two testaments.
For I am the LORD, I do not change; – Mal 3:6
God is not a man, that He should lie,
Nor a son of man, that He should repent. – Num 23:19
Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow of turning. – James 1:17
God does not change. And if we go with the premise we mentioned earlier, that the Bible is true, then we have to accept this statement. So when we read the Bible and we think we see differences in God’s nature, there must have been some unifying purpose behind his actions. So what might that purpose be?
Why so harsh?
Before we can understand the purpose behind some of God’s actions, we need to identify the things that tend to stand out to people. Things like slavery, the Jews’ annihilation of foreign nations, and the seeming unfairness, at times, of God’s actions have caused some to question God’s purposes. After all, God is no respecter of persons, right (Acts 10:34)?
Slavery
In Leviticus 25, God hands down his laws about slavery to the Jews. Basically, Israelites were not to be taken as slaves; at most, they could act as indentured servants for a while. However, they were allowed to take slaves of other nations. Doesn’t that sound harsh? By our standards today, isn’t that kind of inhumane?
But you know, what’s interesting is that the New Testament doesn’t condemn slavery either. Ephesians 6:5-9 talks about it. These two verses sum up the point pretty clearly:
5 Bondservants, be obedient to those who are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ;9 And you, masters, do the same things to them, giving up threatening, knowing that your own Master also[b] is in heaven, and there is no partiality with Him.
Servants are to continue to serve their masters. Why? So they can be a godly example. And masters are to treat their servants well. But the actual practice of slavery is not condemned here. I think the reason for that is the same as when Jesus told Peter to render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s. The gospel was not meant to be political. Christians could live and serve God even in a society that practiced slavery. They would have more impact by obeying than by causing revolution. God didn’t place us on this world to live a comfortable, happy life. If we can, then that’s fantastic. But it’s not something we’re promised. Consider the following verses:
14 There is a vanity which occurs on earth, that there are just men to whom it happens according to the work of the wicked; again, there are wicked men to whom it happens according to the work of the righteous. I said that this also is vanity. – Ecclesiastes 8:14
15 As for man, his days are like grass;
As a flower of the field, so he flourishes.
16 For the wind passes over it, and it is gone,
And its place remembers it no more – Psalm 103:15-16
For what is your life? It is even a vapor that appears for a little time and then vanishes away. – James 4:14
We aren’t on this earth for very long at all. Compared to eternity, our lives here happen in an instant. Furthermore, the rain falls on the just and the unjust (Matt 5:45). Good and bad happen to us all, and that’s what it really means for God to be no respecter of persons.
See, God has perspective. He views things from a standpoint of eternity, but we often only view things from a standpoint of now. When you view things God’s way, you can see how what happens to us in this life doesn’t compare with the life to come. As Paul said:
17 For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, is working for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory, – 2 Cor 4:17
So with slavery, we see that God’s stance didn’t change. Either way, servants were to obey their masters, and masters were to treat their servants well. As always, their physical states were not as important to God as their spiritual states.
Annihilation of Israel’s Enemies
Here’s another one that often bothers us. Several times throughout Israel’s history, they were instructed to utterly destroy the inhabitants of a certain land. In Joshua 6, all the inhabitants of Jericho were destroyed – men, women, children, and animals. The only people left alive were of Rahab the harlot’s household, because she had harbored the Israelite spies.
Why? Why did God have them completely destroy all those nations? The answer is given here:
31 “And I will set your bounds from the Red Sea to the sea, Philistia, and from the desert to the River.[b] For I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and you shall drive them out before you. 32 You shall make no covenant with them, nor with their gods. 33 They shall not dwell in your land, lest they make you sin against Me. For if you serve their gods, it will surely be a snare to you.” – Exodus 23:31-33
God had them destroy those people in order to avoid temptation. Does that still seem harsh? Remember, God deals in eternity. All of us will die… does it really matter how it happens? It wasn’t as though all those people were condemned to Hell. Even though none of them were God’s chosen people – the Israelites – we know that some of them were still saved. Paul, in his address to the Athenians, explains why:
30 Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent – Acts 17:30
God judged these people on some sort of moral law, so when the Israelites were commanded to destroy them, it was to prove a point. It was to show the Israelites that God as no place for sin. We’re taught the same lesson in the New Testament as well.
22 Abstain from every form of evil – 1 Thes 5:22
11 But you, O man of God, flee these things and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness. – 1 Tim 6:11
34 Awake to righteousness, and do not sin; for some do not have the knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame. – 1 Cor 15:34
God commanded the Israelites to wipe out the nations around them so they wouldn’t be led astray. The Israelites didn’t completely do everything God had required of them, and they were subsequently led into the very idolatry that God had warned them about. Gal 3:24 tells us that we use the Old Law as a tutor – we learn from it. And from these examples, we can see that God despises sin, and that if we don’t remove sources of temptation from our lives, we will almost certainly be led astray. God’s methods may have been different between the two laws, but the purpose was the same.
Fairness
Finally, there are a few stories in the Old Testament that seem to go against our ideas of fairness. For instance, in 1 Chronicles 13, we have the story of David transporting the ark of the covenant. Now, God had decreed that the ark should be transported on the shoulders of the Levites. However, David decided that it would be more convenient to ship it on an ox cart. As the cart was traveling along, one of the oxen stumbled, so Uzza, who was driving the cart, stuck his hand up to steady the ark. When he touched it, God struck him dead.
Isn’t that harsh? Uzza only wanted to ensure the ark didn’t fall from the cart. And it wasn’t his idea to transport it that way, it was David’s. Yet God punished him. Why?
Again, God used that instance to teach. His commands couldn’t be taken as mere suggestions; his word had to be respected. It was unfortunate that Uzza had gotten in the way, but God had warned them about what he wanted. Was what happened unfair? Not at all! In fact, I’d say it was extremely fair. God didn’t bend the rules for Uzza; he simply followed through with what he had commanded. He was, by no means, being a respecter of persons. And for us, we learn that God means what he says.
What’s the Bigger Picture?
So after looking at all that, does God contradict himself? Does he show different qualities between the two different testaments? No. As we stated earlier, God is the same. The entire Bible shows the progression of the relationship between God and man. In the beginning, man has a direct relationship with God in the Garden of Eden. Sin destroys that, and the rest of the Bible tells the story of our redemption.
The Old Testament is given to establish a specific people that would be set apart from everyone else – an entire nation to serve God. He gives them a law to teach them how to serve him. Prophecies were established to “set the stage” for Christ’s coming, and the New Law came to complete the process, giving man an avenue to be “reunited” with God in Heaven.
When we see God’s strictness, in either testament, it’s to show us that God means what he says. He is strict. But he’s also merciful. The New Testament tells us that:
28 “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.” – Matt 11:28-30
And so does the Old Testament:
12 “ Now, therefore,” says the LORD, “ Turn to Me with all your heart,
With fasting, with weeping, and with mourning.”
13 So rend your heart, and not your garments;
Return to the LORD your God,
For He is gracious and merciful,
Slow to anger, and of great kindness;
And He relents from doing harm. – Joel 2:12-13
Surrounded December 13, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.1 comment so far
You know, sometimes it’s easy for us to get down or feel like we’re all alone, struggling through the difficulties of our lives. It’s easy to see all the bad that we come into contact with everyday, easy to become discouraged from all the times we’ve failed. We fall into despair.
In 2 Kings 6, there’s an account of someone who felt just that way. And I want to thank my friend Harris for mentioning this to me a couple of weeks ago, and to Randy for reading from this passage tonight. It was a great thought and one that should be shared. In 2 Kings 6, Syria was involved in a war against Israel (doesn’t sound too far-fetched for today either, does it?), but they were having limited success because Elisha, God’s prophet, had been supplying information about Syria to the Israelite king. When Ben-Hadad, the king of Syria discovered this, he was furious. He discovered that Elisha was staying in the city of Dothan, so he sent a great army there, and they surrounded the city by night.
The next morning, Elisha’s servant arose early and went out, only to find the army encamped around their city! The servant ran to Elisha distraught. But Elisha answered him, “Do not fear, for those who are with us are more than those who are with them.” Then Elisha prayed that the servant’s eyes be opened. The mountains all around them were full of chariots and horses of fire.
The Lord takes care of his own. We’re promised this, but it’s so easy to forget it! And Satan wants us to forget it. When things are at their worst, what would we see if God would open our eyes in that way? I think we would see something very like what Elisha’s servant saw. How comforting! We’re never really alone. As 1 Cor 10:13 tells us, God ensures that we never face more than we are able to bear. He’s placed a protective shield around us – an army of flaming chariots, and we can take comfort in the fact that when we’re burdened by tragedy or filled with sorrow, God knows and cares.
What Is Worship? December 13, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.add a comment
In today’s religious world, “worship” has become anything that someone does in the name of God or Jesus (or any other deity, such as Britney Spears). It runs the gamut of everything from preaching, prayer, and singing, to basketball, pie-eating contests, and paintball. I’ve got a close friend who’s a big hunter, and someone recently told him that his hunting was a form of worship too. But we need to understand that just because we may have a skill in something, that doesn’t make it “worship.”
Here’s a link to several different definitions of “worship.” My favorite one is one from The American Heritage Dictionary, which says:
1) The reverent love and devotion accorded a deity, an idol, or a sacred object.
2) The ceremonies, prayers, or other religious forms by which this love is expressed.
Ok, so worship involves expressing our adoration and awe before God, but how exactly do we do that? More importantly, who should decide the things that constitute worship? The worshipper, or the worshipped?
Who Makes the Call?
There are three Old Testament examples that answer this question for us very clearly. Actually, let’s throw a fourth in there just for fun – the blog space is unlimited, after all.
In Genesis 4, we have the story of Cain and Abel. Cain excelled at farming, while his brother, Abel, was a shepherd. At some point, both brothers brought an offering before the Lord. Cain brought some of his crops, and Abel brought of the firstborn of his flock. God respected Abel’s offering, but not Cain’s. Why was that? Well, we don’t know specifics. Perhaps God had told them that he wanted animal sacrifice, but Cain ignored him. Perhaps God hadn’t specified, but something in Cain’s attitude made his offering unacceptable. We just don’t know; although, Hebrews 11 does tell us that Abel’s offering came by faith. Whatever the reason, Cain’s sacrifice was not what God wanted. Cain’s method of worship was unacceptable.
Another example is found in Leviticus 10. Nadab and Abihu were Aaron’s sons, and they were priests. We’re told in this passage that while performing sacrifices, they offered “profane fire” before the Lord, and he consumed them with it. We don’t know exactly what “profane fire” is, except that it was something God hadn’t commanded them. Now, in their minds, I’m sure they were still “worshipping” God; after all, they were offering sacrifices to him. So this wasn’t an outright rebellion against God; it was simply doing something differently than what he had authorized.
Moses also did something other than what God had authorized in Numbers 20. The Israelites were thirsty, and God commanded Moses to speak to a rock, after which, God would cause water to come out of it. Instead, Moses struck the rock (something God had told him to do on a different occasion) and said, “Hear now, you rebels! Must we bring water for you out of this rock?” Water came from the rock. But because Moses hadn’t done what God told him, he was not allowed to enter into the Promised Land.
Finally, though there are plenty of other examples, we’ll leave off with this one. In 1 Sam 13, Saul, who was the first king of Israel, had been waging a war against the Philistines, and the Philistines seemed to have the upper hand. Saul was waiting in Gilgal for Samuel to come, who was a prophet and priest, and would have been able to offer a sacrifice to God on their behalf. After seven days had passed, during which time Samuel was supposed to have come, Saul decided to offer the sacrifice himself. However, Saul was of the tribe of Benjamin, and only Levites were allowed to offer sacrifices. The rest of the story picks up 1 Sam 13:10:
10 Now it happened, as soon as he had finished presenting the burnt offering, that Samuel came; and Saul went out to meet him, that he might greet him.
11 And Samuel said, “What have you done?”
Saul said, “When I saw that the people were scattered from me, and that you did not come within the days appointed, and that the Philistines gathered together at Michmash, 12 then I said, ‘The Philistines will now come down on me at Gilgal, and I have not made supplication to the LORD.’ Therefore I felt compelled, and offered a burnt offering.”
13 And Samuel said to Saul, “You have done foolishly. You have not kept the commandment of the LORD your God, which He commanded you. For now the LORD would have established your kingdom over Israel forever. 14 But now your kingdom shall not continue. The LORD has sought for Himself a man after His own heart, and the LORD has commanded him to be commander over His people, because you have not kept what the LORD commanded you.”
Here, we see that Saul’s reason for offering the sacrifice was very good, but that didn’t excuse the fact that it was still wrong. Because of that, the kingdom was taken from his family, and David reigned instead.
By its very definition, worship is something that is done for the object of worship; therefore, it should be something that the object actually wants! And as luck would have it, God has given us the Bible to tell us what we should do in worship to him.
The Elements
No, I’m not talking about the ones on the Periodic Table. I actually memorized those in 10th grade – no one was surprised by that fantastic feat more than I. No, I’m talking about the elements of worship. I don’t want to go into a whole lot of detail with it, as most of them are pretty self-explanatory.
The worship service should consist of things like teaching (Col 3:16, Heb 5:12-14, Eph 4:11-13), singing (Col 3:16, Eph 5:19, 1 Cor 14:15), preaching (Matt 10:7, 27, Acts 14:21), prayer (1 Thes 5:17, Acts 2:42), the Lord’s Supper (Acts 20:7, I Cor 11:23-34), contribution (1 Cor 16:1-2), etc. Basically, what most people would think of in a “traditional service.”
Many times today, “traditional” services are looked down upon as being stodgy, uptight, and boring. Some of them are. There’s nothing wrong with doing things in a different format from what most of us consider “traditional” as long as it still includes the elements listed above, and as long as it stays in harmony with 1 Cor 14:40, “Let all things be done decently and in order.” But laser light shows, rock concerts, and theatrical productions lend more toward entertainment than exhorting one another or helping each other grow stronger in God’s word.
But We’ve Got to Make It Fun!
No we don’t. Of course, we don’t need to make it boring either, but God was never interested in the entertainment value of his message. Nobody puts a radio or a Parchesi board on a life-preserver because it’s designed to save your life, not show you a good time. God’s word is the same thing. It’s our life-preserver, and if we try to draw people in to learn more about it by having Bingo night and fried chicken dinners, we cheapen it. And we typically only get people who are interested in Bingo and fried chicken.
Instead, we should all be working in our personal lives to be shining examples of Christianity so people can tell that there’s something different about us. And our worship services should be full of things that will actually capture the attention of those who are interested in spiritual things – things that will help them grow in knowledge and wisdom. Gimmicks that are designed to draw more people in the doors, do only that. They bring more people in, but they don’t make more Christians.
In Other Words…
Touchy-feeliness is way too prevalent today. It sounds good and feels good to have this grandfatherly picture of a God who’s always happy his grandkids have graced him with a visit and is just “tickled pink” with everything those precious little kids decide to do. You know, the whole “kumbayah” idea. But that’s not the picture the Bible paints. Does God love us? Of course he does! He sent his own son to die for us! But because of that, the stakes are raised. He’s not going to send his son to be mocked, tortured, and killed by mankind, and then just accept any scraps we’re willing to throw his way. God is love. God is mercy. But he’s also veangeful and just. He demands the utmost respect, which includes respecting what he wants in worship.
It’s very important for us to understand that we don’t get to dictate to God how we want to worship Him. He tells us. And if we’re doing something that doesn’t fit that pattern, then we’re wrong. It’s just that simple. There are lots of things that are ok to do (swimming, cooking, playing cards, washing cars, playing video games). But not all of them belong in the worship service, and they certainly don’t all fall under the realm of “worshipping God.”
Read his word and follow the instructions. Everything else will follow.
Zero Hour December 6, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.4 comments
What if this were it? What if time was up and your life was over? Would you be happy with the way things turned out? More importantly, would God be happy? What did you live for?
You know, one day, time really will be up. In Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey, it was so aptly put this way: “You may be a king or a little street sweeper, but sooner or later, you’ll dance with the Reaper.” The book of James tells us that our life is like a vapor – here for a moment, then vanishes away. It’s up to us how we spend that time.
I spend a good 50 hours at work every week. I have two young daughters that require a lot of attention, I like to play video games and watch TV, I try to exercise semi-regularly, I’ve got a lot of friends I enjoy spending time with as well as a large family spread over three states, and I attend church services at least 3 times a week. Most of you probably fall into the same category – almost every second of our lives is filled with something. Yesterday, I heard that some buses are starting to carry wireless high-speed in an effort to draw more commuters. Tons of people have blackberries or video iPods so we can be entertained every second. Hey, I’m no different, if I’m waiting in line or sitting in traffic, I’ve always got a book with me.
Amid all this hustle and bustle, it’s easy for us to lose track of the things that are really important. One of my favorite passages is Ecclesiastes 12:13-14:
13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter:
Fear God and keep His commandments,
For this is man’s all.
14 For God will bring every work into judgment,
Including every secret thing,
Whether good or evil.
We don’t need to forget that the whole reason we’re here is to serve God. What defines you or me as individuals? Do people think of you as a good musician, a funny guy, someone who’s good with numbers? Or do people first think about your character, your integrity, your walk as a Christian? Matthew 5:14 tells us that we should be the “light of the world.” We should be shining examples to those around us!
Remember what Paul said:
20 I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me. – Galatians 2:20
He was no longer really concerned about himself; he was living for Christ, and Christ was living in him! Every aspect of Paul’s life centered around being a Christian. That was what defined him as a person – so every other endeavor that he involved himself in fit around that aspect. He gave us the same admonition:
1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God. – Romans 12:1-2
We should be “living sacrifices,” and as the passage points out, that’s our “reasonable service.” Jesus gave his life for us, though we were completely undeserving, and he basically asks us to do the same for him. Put to death our old lives, and live for him instead. Quit trying to be like everyone else around us (conform), but become what Christ wants us to be (transform)! You know, that’s exactly what baptism does for us.
3 Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? 4 Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. – Romans 6:3-4
This thought is continued on through verse 14 of that chapter, but it’s evident from what we see here that the waters of baptism symbolize the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ. We put to death our old life of sin by turning away from it in repentance. Then, we’re buried in the waters of baptism, just as Christ was placed in the tomb. And just as he rose from the dead, we rise from baptism a new creature, cleansed from all impurity. Only then can we “walk in newness of life” by serving God and following Christ.
Another excellent passage is Romans 8:38-39:
38 For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, 39 nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
What a comforting passage! Nothing can separate us from God’s love – nothing has that power! And nothing can separate us from the salvation that he offers. Except of course, for ourselves. Nothing, not even Satan, can pull us away from God – unless we allow it. If we get too tangled up in the affairs of this life, we’ll drown. God’s thrown us the life-preserver, but we have to grab it! And once we’ve taken hold of it, we can’t let go!
Read your Bible. Teach those around you. Be the example that God wants you to be. He’s promised to protect us and guide us through, but we can’t lose sight of the goal. Push forward!
12 Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me. 13 Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, 14 I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. – Phil 3:12-14
26 Therefore I run thus: not with uncertainty. Thus I fight: not as one who beats the air. 27 But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified. – 1 Cor 9:26-27
Holy Spirit Baptism: What exactly is it? November 30, 2006
Posted by Nate in Blogroll, Religion, Uncategorized.8 comments
In my opinion, there’s a lot of confusion about this topic today. The Holy Spirit is one of those things that gets discussed a lot, but there’s limited information on in the Bible. Those two conditions, much discussion and little information, don’t usually lead to anything real productive. So I thought I’d take a minute to discuss one facet of the Holy Spirit that we do have some information on: the Holy Spirit Baptism.
Don’t get me wrong, there’s lots of disagreement about this topic too. But let’s go back to the source and see if we can’t figure out what it is and what it’s for.
11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. – Matthew 3:11
Ok, maybe that sounds a little confusing. I mean, what exactly is baptism of Holy Spirit and fire? Luckily, we still have several passages that deal with it. In Acts 1:4-8, Jesus explains this passage a little more.
And being assembled together with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the Father, “which,” He said, “you have heard from Me; for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.” Therefore, when they had come together, they asked Him, saying, “Lord, will You at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?” And He said to them, “It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority. But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.”
Here, Jesus tells us that the baptism John had been talking about in Matt 3 was going to come upon Jesus’ disciples; people who had already been saved. So, obviously, this Holy Spirit baptism had nothing to do with salvation; instead, Jesus points out in vs 8 that it would help them be witnesses for Christ. How did it do that? We’re told in John 16:13, where it says, “However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell you things to come.” Now we see that the Holy Spirit would help them by “guiding them into all truth.” As we know, they didn’t have the Bible back then, so they had to receive God’s Word in some other way. The Holy Spirit’s influence is how the apostles knew what God wanted. It’s the reason we view their writings as inspired by God.
In Acts 2, we see the fulfillment of this prophecy. The Holy Spirit comes upon the apostles on the Day of Pentecost, and it appears as “tongues of fire” above their heads. The apostles speak to the crowd there, and Peter delivers a sermon telling them who Jesus was and proving He was the Christ. When asked, Peter tells them what they must do to be saved (Acts 2:37-38). And here, it’s interesting that he still commands them to be baptized. As far as we know, it is still referencing water baptism, even though the apostles had just been given the “baptism of the Holy Spirit.” So, again, it seems that Holy Spirit baptism is not used for salvation. More on this point in a moment…
The only other account we have of the Holy Spirit coming upon someone in a similar way is in Acts 10, with Cornelius and his household. As was pointed out earlier, there is no indication anywhere in the Scriptures that the outpouring of the Holy Spirit had anything to do with salvation. In this example, it was used to prove to Peter and the other Jews present that salvation was now available to the Gentiles as well. After the Holy Spirit comes upon Cornelius and his family, Peter still says they need to be baptized with water (Acts 10:46-48).
Now that we see what the “baptism of fire and the Holy Spirit” is, we go back to all the examples we have of baptism being used in the salvation process. In 1 Peter 3:21, Acts 8:36, and Acts 10:46-48, we see that water baptism is still being used. The main difference between John’s baptism and the baptism in these passages is that Christ hadn’t died when John’s baptism was in effect, but Christ was dead when we see these other examples. His death is the necessary element that makes baptism work at all. John had been sent to “prepare the way” for Jesus, so his baptism was used as a “bridge” between the Old Law and the New Law; it helped transition people to the requirements of the New Law.
Besides, if water baptism wasn’t required today, but instead, it’s supposed to be a “Holy Spirit” baptism, then why introduce water baptism at all? At most, it only would have been used for a few years – just the time from John’s ministry to Jesus’s death. If water baptism didn’t translate after that, then why was it introduced? Why do we have examples of water baptism after Christ’s death? What examples or passages do we have that support “Holy Spirit” baptism as being involved with salvation?
I hope this has been helpful; comments are welcome…
Homosexuality: When Religious People Lose Their Credibility November 28, 2006
Posted by Nate in Blogroll, Religion, Uncategorized.3 comments
Maybe this sounds strange, but I think homosexuality has been gaining a lot of popularity over the last 20 or 30 years. Almost every sitcom today touches on it at some point, and several shows (Will and Grace, The L Word, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, Queer as Folk, etc) completely revolve around the lifestyle. The popular stance today is to be completely accepting of homosexuality, whether one actually practices it or not. And those who openly oppose it are often ridiculed and accused of being bigots.
Lately, the topic of gay marriage has come up over and over again, and we’re even seeing “churches” that have begun accepting homosexuals as members, and even ministers. It’s that last development that has been so surprising to me. When “Christian” organizations wander so far from the truth that they are unable to express what could be wrong with homosexuality, then they no longer have a standard for anything.
On November 20, USA Today posted an article on this very subject. And being over a week old, it’s practically ancient news in today’s cyber-age, but I wanted to comment on it anyway. The article is When Religion Loses its Credibility by Oliver “Buzz” Thomas who is (believe it or not) a Baptist minister. If you haven’t read this article, I highly recommend it, because the rest of this post will be addressing it.
Thomas poses the question: “What if Christian leaders are wrong about homosexuality?” And instead of honestly asking that question, it becomes apparent very quickly that Thomas thinks that’s the case. He has come to the conclusion that scientists have all but proven homosexuality is inherited, not a choice. He also points out that homosexuality is condemned in Leviticus, which also teaches us to keep the Sabbath Day (no more work or sports on Saturdays – or even traveling) and to kill anyone that disrespects their parents or eats unclean foods. So if that’s the case, wouldn’t we have to follow all those laws? He also says that Jesus didn’t teach against homosexuality, but instead taught us to love and not judge each other.
Wow! Sounds like a strong case, huh? Well the saddest thing about this article is that a supposed “Baptist minister” has either purposefully misrepresented the Bible’s teachings, or he has a gross misunderstanding. Bear with me, and we’ll address all of his points.
Science
Thomas starts off by talking about the reaction Galileo got from the religious community when he proposed that the earth was round and compares that to how religion is stubbornly refusing to see scientific facts again. This argument is ridiculous. Yes, religious people did raise a stink about Galileo, but the Bible was not in disagreement at all! The Bible never taught that the sun revolved around the earth, people merely assumed that. The difference here is that it’s not just religious people who are saying homosexuality is wrong – the Bible teaches it!
I’m not going to spend much time on the scientific arguments, other than to say that Thomas’s assertion that “whether sexual orientation arises as a result of the mother’s hormones or the child’s brain structure or DNA, it is almost certainly an accident of birth” is a gigantic overstatement. Has there been evidence that homosexuality could be genetic? Yes. But there has also been evidence to the contrary.
Within a matter of minutes, I was able to find several articles on the subject. One of them is titled “The Gay Gene: Assertions, Retractions, and Controversy,” another is “Gay Gene or Gay Germ?,” and another is “New Study Confirms Homosexuality Can Be Overcome.” Each of these articles takes a different approach to the subject and each reaches different conclusions, but the point is that scientists are in no way approaching a conclusion on this matter – nothing has been proven. As a matter of fact, there were two points brought up in these articles that I found interesting. “The Gay Gene” observed that when LeVay conducted his study in 1991 and first discovered the differences between the brains of young homosexual men and young heterosexual men, most of the gay men had died of AIDS. So were the differences caused by genetics, or suffering through the AIDS virus? And “Gay Gene or Gay Germ” asks why wouldn’t the gay gene die out if it really exists? Bottom line: the proof Thomas talked about doesn’t yet exist.
However, just for a moment, let’s assume there is some genetic predisposition to homosexuality. Does that change anything? I don’t think it does. Some people struggle with anger, while it isn’t a problem for others. Some people are kleptomaniacs, but stealing is still considered to be wrong. Some people struggle with drugs, alchohol, pornography, lying, etc, and yet other people don’t. My point is that we all have certain vices we struggle with, but that doesn’t give us license to give in to them. Homosexuality is no different.
What Does the Bible Teach? – Part 1
Thomas points out that religious people today often go back to Leviticus to prove homosexuality is wrong, yet they are unwilling to follow the other commands listed there (keeping the Sabbath, offering sacrifices, etc). The reason he gives for this discrepancy is as follows:
The truth is that mainstream religion has moved beyond animal sacrifice, slavery and the host of primitive rituals described in Leviticus centuries ago. Selectively hanging onto these ancient proscriptions for gays and lesbians exclusively is unfair according to anybody’s standard of ethics.
Well, if that were the real reason (and for some people, it sadly is) then he’s absolutely right. They’ve got no basis for picking and choosing which laws to follow.
However, his misunderstanding of this issue revolves around the misconception that Leviticus (and the Old Law in general) was ever meant for Christians. Thomas needs to read Romans, Galatians, Collossians, and especially Hebrews. These books lay out God’s plan. That the Old Law was given for the Jews to follow – no one else. It was meant as a teacher or tutor – something to teach Jews (and later the Gentiles) about who God is and what he expects (Gal 3:19-25). Have you ever wondered why the Bible was split up into the Old and New Testaments? They are separate laws governing God’s people. The first was given to his physical people – the nation of Israel. The second was given for his spiritual people – everyone who follows him (Jews and Gentiles (Romans 1:16-17)).
The entire book of Hebrews discusses this transition and why it was necessary. Heb 8:7-13 lays out the main point:
7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. 8 Because finding fault with them, He says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah— 9 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in My covenant, and I disregarded them, says the LORD. 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 11 None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them. 12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their lawless deeds[b] I will remember no more.”[c]
13 In that He says, “A new covenant, ” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
We don’t follow what’s written in Levticus because it’s been done away with. Thomas, who is supposed to be a Baptist minister should know this, but from his article, it is evident that he doesn’t. If anyone would like more clarification on the differences between the Old Law and New Law, let me know. But it’s too lengthy to get into here.
What Does the Bible Teach? – Part 2
Now that we understand why we don’t have to follow the laws in Leviticus, let’s move on to those that we do have to follow: the ones in the New Testament.
First of all, let’s look at two passages concerning the veracity of scripture:
16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. – 2 Tim 3:16-17
19 And so we have the prophetic word confirmed,[a] which you do well to heed as a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts; 20 knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation,[b] 21 for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God[c] spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. – 2 Pet 1:19-21
Here, we have 2 passages that tell us 1) the entire Bible is from God, not just the stuff in red, and 2) we don’t have the luxury of interpreting what’s written in any way we want. There is one way to interpret the Bible, all we decide is whether or not to follow it.
But even so, I’d like to go ahead and address Thomas’s question “what would Jesus do?” Thomas asserts that Jesus never spoke about homosexuality, and that’s true… but not completely. Jesus spoke about marriage in Matthew 5 and also in Matthew 19:1-10. If you read that passage, you’ll see that Christ describes marriage as being between one man and one woman. That’s it. No other parties involved. We also know that fornication is condemned (2 Cor 12:21, Gal 5:19, Eph 5:3, etc). So, if sex is only permissible in marriage, and marriage is only between a man and a woman, then there’s no room for homosexuality. Jesus didn’t have to address bestiality here; it’s wrong by default. Homosexuality, therefore, is also wrong.
But the New Testament doesn’t leave it there. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 says:
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[a] nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
This is the passage that Thomas says is actually condemning a form of pedophilia. However, if you’ll notice, he uses the phrase “most likely” refers to pederasty. That’s because there’s no circumstantial evidence that supports this theory. Sure, it could be talking about pederasty, but that still wouldn’t rule out it’s condemnation of homosexuality.
Furthermore, there’s another passage that Thomas ignored altogether.
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. – Romans 1:26-27
This passage leaves nothing to the imagination. It plainly spells out that it’s condemning homosexuality. There are also passages like 1 Tim 1:10 that condemn fornication and sodomy. The conclusion is pretty simple: the Bible teaches homosexuality is wrong.
“Judge not…”
Finally, Thomas pulls out one of the most famous passages for getting annoying “nay-sayers” off your back:
1 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3 And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? 5 Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” – Matt 7:1-5
This passage has been misused for countless generations. Jesus isn’t saying that we shouldn’t help those who are involved in sin; we’re actually commanded to do just that (1 Cor 5:1-8; Jude 22, 23; James 5:19-20)! We are obligated to help those who are involved in sin, but we can’t do that if we’re not allowed to make an observation of whether or not they’re sinning. The passage in Matthew 7 doesn’t say not to remove the speck in our brother’s eye, it just says we need to remove the plank from ours first. We’re not idiots (most of us). God gave us brains and he gave us his word. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to determine whether or not someone’s following it.
In Conclusion…
Anyone who looks at the Bible in an unbiased manner can clearly see that homosexuality is condemned. It’s nothing personal, it’s just a fact. For those who profess to be Christians and follow God’s word, you’re left with no other alternative. Mr Thomas has departed from that line of rationale, though. He’s embraced the popular notion that the Bible is outdated and everybody’s ok, regardless of their lifestyle. Honestly, I’m surprised he even bothered to mention any scripture at all; it sounds as though he’s thrown it all out.
Sadly, it’s a commentary on how skewed our society is that a man like that is allowed to publish such nonsense in a national media outlet. His opinion lies far from that of most religious people, and certainly beyond what the Bible teaches on the subject. I emailed USA Today to see if they’d be interested in running a rebuttal in order to get a fair and balanced perspective, but they never responded. Unfortunately, most people today are more interested in feeling good about themselves or being accepted by the “popular kids” to worry too much about truth.
By the way, I first came across this article from a fellow blogger: Blackbox. His article “What if Religion is Wrong About Homosexuality” is an interesting read, and you can see our comments to one another at the bottom of the page.
Creation vs. Spontaneous Combustion November 22, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.19 comments
When I logged on here tonight, I saw a good article called “How Hubble Killed God.” As you might have imagined, this article details how some of the data from the Hubble telescope disproves the notion that the earth is only about 6000 years old. You really should read it, since he explains his position much better than I ever could, but to give you the gist of it, his argument centers around the distance of the images the telescope has captured.
“Light speed, Mr Sulu…”
I’m sure most of you are familiar with the term “light-year,” but aside from old Star Trek episodes, do you know what it means? It’s pretty self-explanatory. A “light-year” is the distance that light is able to travel in a year. Light does not illuminate an object immediately. For instance, if you shine a flashlight at your wall, there’s a slight delay from the time you flip the switch to the point that you’re able to make shadow puppets (of course, you’ll never notice this delay). The average distance between the earth and the sun is 92,900,000 miles, and it takes light about 8 minutes to travel that distance. So when you see the sun finally sink below the horizon, it actually passed that point 8 minutes earlier. Pretty trippy, huh?
Stu (the blogger that posted this article) points out that the Hubble telescope has captured images from galaxies that are about 13 billion light-years away! Therefore, he concludes that the earth can’t be a measly 6000-ish years old (as far as the question of whether or not there’s a God, he’s pretty ambivalent; just thought the title was catchy). Well, I’d like to make a couple of observations.
The Chicken, or the Egg?
First of all, if you look at the creation account in Genesis, there are several interesting things that pop out at you. For one, creating this complex universe didn’t seem to be too difficult for God – he merely spoke it all into existence. Just as interesting is the fact that everything was fully formed. He didn’t make Adam and Eve into infants, they were adults. The four rivers mentioned in Genesis didn’t start out as tiny streams, they were rivers. Trees were trees, not saplings, etc.
So when God made the sun, I don’t believe he had to wait 8 minutes for its light to reach the earth. When God made stars (all of the stars, planets, etc were made on the 4th day, by the way), I don’t think he had to wait light-years before they showed up. God made everything as if it had already been here, so why couldn’t he have made something with its light already shining as far away as he wanted? After all, if he can speak things into existence, do you really think he’s going to be bound by the same rules of physics he created? Now, Stu would probably say that that’s a convenient copout. And since God created us all with a free will, Stu’s entitled to that opinion. But before you agree with him, check out the next section.
Proofs
The coolest thing about all of this is that the Bible gives some actual proofs for its veracity. Archaeology has backed up many of the Bible’s claims, and history has as well. But sticking to the realm of science, there are some passages that mention things that weren’t common knowledge until relatively recently.
10 He drew a circular horizon on the face of the waters,
At the boundary of light and darkness – Job 26:10
22 It is He who sits above the circle of the earth, - Isaiah 40:22
These two passages show that the earth was round long before anyone knew that, and definitely long before many people maintained that it was a possibility.
7 He stretches out the north over empty space;
He hangs the earth on nothing. – Job 26:7
We know now that the earth hangs in empty space, supported only by gravity (which is invisible). There were countless theories back then about how the earth was supported. Very few would have believed that it was hanging in empty space, yet that’s what the Bible teaches.
16 “Have you entered the springs of the sea?
Or have you walked in search of the depths? – Job 38:16
People didn’t know there were “springs in the sea” until the last few centuries.
Bottom line: there are several things that science has only proven in the past few centuries that were written well before Christ’s birth. People who choose to follow God and the teachings in the Bible must do it based on faith. But it doesn’t have to be blind faith.
One Last Point
In my very first real blog post, I talked about the mystery God has revealed to us. This final point I want to make goes along with that first post very well. We need to be careful when we put too much stock in science or our own understanding. Plenty of people have made severe blunders in the name of science. Marie Curie helped discover radium, which has been very useful. However, she made the mistake of carrying it around with her a good bit too, and that stuff will make you glow in the dark…
The Bible comes right out and warns us several times about blinding ourselves with our own wisdom. Several of those passages are quoted in my first post. One of the most direct passages is this one:
9 The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10 and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, 12 that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. – 2 Thes 2:9-12
For those who don’t really want to believe in God’s word, there are other things they can choose from. Now that’s not to say that they’ve been led astray and can’t help it. 2 Pet 3:9 tells us that God wants everyone to be saved and do what’s right. But some people just aren’t interested, and so God allowed a way for them to do what they want. When people embrace evolution, the Big Bang, etc, etc, they’re looking for anything other than what God said, and they’ll find just enough substance to convince themselves, and therefore, blind themselves to the truth. Let’s not fall into the same trap. Let’s keep open minds and continually strive to find the truth, whatever that might be.
Vatican Sticks with Celibacy November 16, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.1 comment so far
Ok, here’s a great article. In a nut shell (and I’m trying not to use “nut” disparagingly), the Vatican held a summit to discuss the recent excommunication of an African archbishop, Emmanuel Milingo, who ordained four married American men as bishops. He was already on the hotseat for getting married himself in 2001. In the summit, it was decided that the excommunication would stand, and the Vatican reaffirmed its stance that clergy (honestly, I’m not sure if it’s all clergy or not) must remain celibate.
On Whose Authority?
One of the things that I find interesting about this is the fact that the Vatican gets to decide anything. It reminds me of Han Solo reprimanding Princess Leia for wanting to bring everything before a committee. About the only time we see the early church bring something before a committee was in Acts 15, when the apostles met to discuss circumcision. But see, at that point, the only direction they had was God’s inspiration through the apostles. The Bible hadn’t been written yet.
But today, we have the Bible, and it tells us exactly what God wants us to do. Christ doesn’t change (Heb 13:8), and therefore, his message doesn’t change either. Furthermore, Galatians 1:6-10 tells us:
6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.
And Jude 3 says:
3 Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.
God’s given us his message, and it’s not going to change. So for a group of men to sit around and decide what is acceptable and what is not should send red flags up for us.
Thou Shalt Not Acquire a “Ball and Chain?”
Another issue is this whole idea of celibacy. Ok, yeah, Paul gave the idea the big thumbs up, but only as a “hey, that’d be nice” kind of idea. Let’s look at what he said about it:
8 But I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am; 9 but if they cannot exercise self-control, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion. – 1 Cor 7:8-9
This was not a command. Paul was saying that if you can remain unmarried and keep from sin, then do it! You’re free to serve God in so many capacities, when you don’t have to concern yourself with providing for a family. However, if sex is too big of a temptation, then you should get married. That’s it.
And as far as those in positions of “spiritual leadership” go, the Bible always placed great importance on being married. Obviously, marriage is not a prerequisite to preaching – Paul is a great example of that. But to be an elder or a deacon, marriage is a necessity (1 Tim 3; Titus 1).
Then there’s the biggest problem with this concept. There’s the passage that seems to have been written specifically for Catholics:
1 Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, 2 speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, 3 forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. – 1 Tim 4:1-3
This passage makes it clear that commanding celibacy is a false doctrine, and yet it’s something the Catholic church refuses to let go of. The passage even mentions how these false teachers will command people to stay away from certain foods, etc… Hmm, sounds a little fishy to me…
The Big Finish
You know, what really gets me about these kinds of things is that people will wax eloquent on all the reasons why “blah, blah, blah,” and why not “blah, blah, blah,” instead of going back to the (supposed) source of it all – the Bible! I just don’t understand arguing back and forth over an issue that is so black and white in the Bible. Now, that’s not to say that I’m perfect or have it all figured out (not to say I don’t, either
), but some issues are so clear that we just don’t have any excuse. You know, it’s the same thing that Romans 1 talks about concerning the Gentiles, before the New Law came. Even though they didn’t have God’s law at the time, it didn’t matter:
20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools – Romans 1:20-22
We have to follow Christ’s teachings, if we’re truly going to be Christians.
It’s Only as “Mysterious” as We Make It November 14, 2006
Posted by Nate in Religion, Uncategorized.1 comment so far
If you’ve spent much time perusing your Bible, you’ve probably stumbled across passages dealing with the “mystery” (and most likely, these were passages written by Paul). In Ephesians 3, Paul spends time revealing the mystery to us: that the Gentiles now have access to salvation! Wrapped up in this mystery is God’s entire plan of salvation – salvation for all! But why is it called a “mystery?” And should it still be “mysterious” to us today?
I think 1 Corinthians 1:18-25 best explains the way in which Christ’s gospel was/is a mystery. As vs 18 says:
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
We can see from this passage that God’s plan of salvation makes no sense to those who refuse to believe it, but to those of us who accept it, it’s brilliant! Verse 21 goes on to say:
21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
See, because the world is so “wise,” it views the concept of God as foolishness. They have been blinded by their own pretensions. For the Jews and Greeks of the day, it wasn’t that they didn’t believe in the supernatural; it wasn’t that they didn’t believe in deities. Their problem was that they thought they already knew what God would do. The Jews already had a fixed idea of what the Messiah would be, so when Christ appeared and didn’t lead them to victory against the Romans, they refused to accept him. The Greeks didn’t accept Christ because they couldn’t conceive of a god allowing himself to be put to death by his own creation. And because they already had things “figured out,” they missed their chance.
Today, people do the same thing. They would rather put faith in scientific theories that have not been proven. They would rather believe that all of the order we see in our universe (the fragile food chain, vast differences throughout the animal and plant kingdoms, the very specific orbits of planets, etc) was created through a giant explosion (something that, in all practical applications, has only been shown to destroy, not create). Have they been blinded by their own “wisdom?”
Too often, even those who profess to be religious only listen to their own ideas about what God wants. Many times they view the Bible as a collection of stories or suggestions, and not the ”wisdom of God that leads to salvation” that 1 Corinthians purports it to be. How is that different from what the Jews and Greeks were condemned for?
Throughout the Bible, passages talk about truth and understanding. I firmly believe that God gave us understanding and intellect for a reason. We are supposed to be able to understand God’s message for us. It’s not supposed to be “mysterious” any longer. It’s not supposed to be some “better felt than told” experience. No, God’s word is supposed to be powerful and undeniable. It’s supposed to move us and touch us in a way that nothing else can. But for it to do that, we have to read it, study it, know it.
Hello world! November 14, 2006
Posted by Nate in Uncategorized.add a comment
Well, this is the first official post of my new blog. Don’t expect much, though. I’m hoping to turn this into a weekly thing with posts centering around religion – specifically, “Christianity.”
Wish me luck…